This was actually the first time I had heard of the pro-rape Facebook page.
Had I known about it back then, my response would be to suggest that those men who are pro-rape to spend a week in prison and see if they don't change their minds about rape. Why do they assume that rape only refers to man on woman?
2 comments:
Also rape is the reverse women on men. It's rare, but it's true.
I had heard of this sort of "reverse rape". I kinda wonder the circumstances of such an act, because isn't a man who is "aroused" being aroused with his consent? That is, can a man have an unconsenting arousal? I would think that if the man isn't consenting to being aroused, then he wouldn't be able to have an erection. But then, what do I know of such things? Guys can be pretty weird about what arouses them, so I suppose an unconsented arousal is theoretically possible.
Okay, how did I end up talking about arousals? LOL
Post a Comment